Our first question is…asking… Why was Hank not initially removed from the situation? (if you need to read the history go here...) A responsible person would have done so. It is our opinion based on contact with key players that the puppy died because it was in the custody of an animal abuser and the wrong person was made responsible for the crime.
No one other than Peacock or her daughter testified against Austin.
No one except these two...mother and daughter claimed to have seen Austin abuse Hank,...what's more many witnesses came forward testifying Austin was not capable of animal abuse. After Austin was sentenced it was and has been reported by a person(s) very close to Peacock that Dakota actually used to hurt Hank quite severely.
No one actually investigated Dakota’s background and a publicity campaign against Austin was created even before Austin’s sentencing.
A tremendous amount of effort went into drumming up public support for his guilt, but if you look at the history...evidence is simply lacking... this is not exactly the same as actual guilt.
The evidence was all circumstantial.
Innocent people, volunteers were also charged and then sued for slander when they came forward and reported irregularities and confronted Peacock. Only they were telling the truth!
While the civil crimes Peacock committed were true… even the crime of adultery, which when made public… shut down Peacock’s lawsuit, (she ran with her tail between her legs as she herself was facing a lawsuit with real documentation) she bullied people until the very end, including finding people to make physical threats against volunteers!
Another issue is using the police force for false reporting and intimidation and based on texts we have...we think it was pre-meditated.
Police officers are not immune from fraudulent actions either.
Unless They Have Experience With Female Manipulators…
Peacock does have a very calculating practiced demeanor according to eyewitnesses. She does not show much empathy that is consistent with Animal Welfare People...She went from selling Pure Romance intimate items (Dildos to Dogs?) to running a non-profit where most of the materials and activities were actually created by other people. She appears to use sexuality as a diversionary tactic.
Damsel In Distress
Great Explanation. (Click Here)
The crime of Animal Abuse is like Child Abuse...The Mere Idea of it Rouses Strong Emotions!
Smokescreen.
This whole episode would be comical except negative contact with grifters never is. The public and businesses lost out. This non-profit is dissolved. It should not be collecting donations. Shut It Down!
Understanding Manipulators: (Click Here)
look at the track record. Jennifer Nick, Goin, Cook, Peacock has basically been a serial adulterer. She has routinely cheated on her husbands and boyfriends and will probably do so again. She literally was using the wife of one of the volunteers (whose spouse she was committing adultery with) to do work and this spouse even helped her move out of her house so unbeknownst to her Peacock could be with her husband!
32-604. ADULTERY. Adultery is the voluntary sexual intercourse of a married person with a person other than the offender’s husband or wife.
32-604. ADULTERY. Adultery is the voluntary sexual intercourse of a married person with a person other than the offender’s husband or wife.
History:
[(32-604) R.S., sec. 2458; reen. R.C. & C.L., sec. 2648; C.S., sec. 4628; I.C.A., sec. 31-604.]
Comments
Post a Comment